I believe the true definition of objectivity is a method of delivering the news which is clear-eyed, factual, and free of agenda. As we've learned in class, that doesn't necessarily mean ridding ourselves, as journalists, of our individual beliefs and worldviews, but instead it means not letting those aspects of our lives dictate how we report. I believe that an objective story is one which presents the facts of an event in their entirety, compiled compellingly yet free of manipulation or any attempt to indoctrinate. This doesn't mean that the story can't be reflective of the writer's beliefs.
As this image suggests, I believe it's necessary for journalists to strike as balanced a tone as possible in their writing, so long as it doesn't dilute the importance or impact of a story. I think this story from the Los Angeles Times is a good example of a balanced, clear-eyed look at an incredibly important ongoing event in our country. The writers take no clear sides, but do well to portray the pressing nature of the story as well as the differing viewpoints of the parties involved. I think objectivity provides a framework for ethical behavior, as it stresses providing the public with factual information which they can then interpret. This, I think, is journalism's most important professional, social, and ethical responsibility.
Nice,
ReplyDeleteThanks for your grateful informations, I am working in, asian affairs magazine
so it will be a better information’s for me. Try to post best informations like this always